Legal Opinion

State v. McKee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1974No. 55583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

In this appeal, defendant James E. McKee attempts to raise questions which he contends arose during his trial on a charge of uttering a forged instrument. He does not argue or cite authority in support of two of his contentions, and we do not consider them. State v. Mattingly, 220 N.W.2d 865 (Iowa).

At trial, the State produced two witnesses. Gerald D. Schafer testified that someone stole his checkbook and that he did not sign or authorize anyone to sign his name to a check payable to James E. McKee. James Askelson testified defendant came to Askel-son’s oil station,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Clifford L. Duke, Jr., Louis Glenn Ballard and Vic Buono v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Huey R. Lee v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. State v. LaMarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. State v. SwallomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. State v. ProulxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. State v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State v. RyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API