Legal Opinion

Rugon Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 25, 1986No. 85-1505Published

1Per curiam

The trial court found that a workers compensation carrier had validly cancelled its insurance coverage for nonpayment of premium and held the insurance agent liable to the employer for failure to keep the employer’s business covered with workers compensation. We find no error and affirm, the carrier having met the statutory conditions to cancel the policy. It was clear from the trial court’s findings that the employer relied on the agent for all matters in regard to this insurance.1 Therefore, under the reasoning of the following authorities, we affirm. Insurance Company of North America v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Woodcock v. Motors Ins. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. DiFalco v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Olnick v. Robert Myers Painting, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Sunrise CateringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API