Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cefalu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 30, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant and his wife are officers of a closely held corporation that they started on May 6, 2002 for the purpose of selling advertising through a resource booklet distributed to casualty insurers throughout the country. The business was primarily run by claimant’s wife out of their home. After claimant was laid off from his job, he filed a claim for unemployment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KoenesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of VerdecchiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of SpinningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of SuriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of IbrahimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of EllisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Claim of LandryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API