Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Beacon Well Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1993No. 71095Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.

We decide in this case the Legislature did not intend 20 O.S.1981, § 106.4 to be applicable to the proceeding where the general jury panel is qualified and excusáis are made. That proceeding is a part of the administrative impanelment process, rather than being a judicial proceeding within the contemplation of § 106.4. Further, there is no requirement that excusáis or exemptions from the general jury panel all be accomplished at any specific proceeding. Thus, in so far as appellant claims error under § 106.4, which provides that a refusal of a court to permit or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API