Legal Opinion

Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 23, 1988No. Appeal 88-1322PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Earl Jason Lariscey, appearing pro se, appeals the decision of the United States Claims Court1 denying his motion for appointment of counsel to assist him in actions before the Claims Court and in patent application proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Claims Court held that it did not have the authority to appoint counsel. The focus of this appeal is Mr. Lariscey’s request that the Federal Circuit exercise its authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and appoint said counsel. We deny his request that we appoint counsel and affirm the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Hayes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. United Medical Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Pitts v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Young v. MSPBCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API