Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bethard v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1994No. 92-CO-998Published

1ConcurrenceKing, Associate Judge

I agree that the order of contempt must be reversed, but not for the reasons stated by the majority.

A brief recitation of the facts is in order. Bethard, having been charged with driving under the influence, appeared in the traffic court on the morning of April 17, 1992, for trial. The judge observed Bethard nodding off, and stumbling and falling over other people seated in the courtroom which the judge found disruptive. On two occasions the judge dispatched the deputy United States Marshal to “check on [Bethard’s] condition.” Efforts to locate Bethard’s counsel were unsuccessful and, “after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Swisher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Matter of SchaefferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In Re KrautDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API