Townes v. Park Motor Sales, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Botein, P. J. (dissenting).
The affirmance by the majority is based on a holding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law in two respects: (1) in permitting the accumulation of caked grease and oil on the floor prior to the fire, and (2) in his negligent conduct after the buffer burst into flames. It is not concluded by the majority, as was held by the trial court, that plaintiff was negligent in using a defective buffer.
The evidence does not compel a finding that plaintiff was responsible for the condition of the floors. He had been on the premises but a few months, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lowery v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Amsterdam Color Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Amsterdam Color Works, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wardrop v. . Santi Moving Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.