Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Levinson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1895No. 15916Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J.V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

The Court.

Motion to recall the remittitur herein for the purpose of securing a modifical of the direction made therein for the payment of the costs of the appeal.

Without reference to the merits of the motion, it comes too late. The remittitur was regularly issued on September 6, 1895, and this motion was not noticed until October 18th following. If respondent desired a modification of the judgment in any respect, the proper application should have been made before the going down of. the remittitur. (Gray v. Palmer, 11 Cal. 341.) When the remittitur has been duly and regularly issued, without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API