People v. Stovall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the verdict convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and acquitting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) is repugnant. We disagree. A verdict is repugnant “only in those instances where acquittal on one crime as charged to the jury is conclusive as to a necessary element of the other crime, as charged, for which the guilty verdict was rendered” (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1, 7, rearg denied 55 NY2d 1039).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HightowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Baim v. EidensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. AliceaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001