Legal Opinion
Kent v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 22, 2002No. CIV.A. 5:01CV379BNPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
On January 16, 2002, this Court Ordered Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) to show cause as to the reasons sanctions, in the form of attorneys’ fees and costs, should not be imposed in conjunction with the Order that granted the Motion of Plaintiffs to Remand the above referenced case to the Circuit Court of Claiborne County, Mississippi. The Court has considered the response of Ford to the subject Order and finds that Ford has not shown good cause, and that Plaintiffs are entitled to recover the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred as a result of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adam Frederick Chapman v. Powermatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Badon v. R J R Nabisco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Miranti v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Johnson v. Heublein Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. TenninMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Ford Motor Company, Inc. v. Julia TenninMississippi Supreme Court · 2003