Legal Opinion

Lupton v. American Wholesale Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

By his demurrer to the hill of complaint in this case the defendant ¡asserted that a court of equity was without jurisdiction, 'and that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, with respect to. the 'alleged cause of action. The appeal is from .an order ovetmiling the. demurrer.

In effect the hill .avers that the plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of selling dry goods, notions, clothing, and general merchandise to retail merchants throughout the United States; that the defendant was employed by the plaintiff as. the ’head of the credit department of its business for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Rock Hill College v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Downs v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Mills v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Dombrovski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nagel v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Hill v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Legum v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Zalis v. OrmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Whiteley v. SchoenleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API