Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Bloom

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 15, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal. The action was brought by Richard Kelly, suing as a receiver, &c., against Rachel Bloom, administratrix, &c. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bt the Court.*—Mohell,J.

The action, in effect, was to recover the balance of purchase-money of two houses and lots, sold and conveyed by Joseph Lynch to the defendant’s intestate, Edward IST. Bloom. The cause was tried by a justice of this court without a jury, who found the balance of the purchase-money unpaid to be $1,823.30; and he adjudged that the conveyance from Lynch vested in the defendant’s intestate the title to said houses and lots in fee-simple, subject to the lien of certain mortgages thereon, and to the taxes and assessments which had previously been levied thereon. After…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Inverarity v. StowellOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hughes v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.United States Circuit Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API