Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olson v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1987No. OTC 2379; SC S33327Published

1DissentPeterson, C. J.

The majority concludes that the plaintiff is personally liable for delinquent taxes because he was an “employer” as defined in ORS 316.162 (3) (b). I dissent.

I agree that the corporation in this case was the type of corporation that the Commission described and targeted in its proposed legislation and that plaintiff Olson is within the class of persons potentially subject to personal liability by virtue of his position as a director and officer in the corporation. Plaintiff Olson, however, does not fit the Commission’s description of an officer who was “charged with the responsibility for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frutiger v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Olson v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API