Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1944No. 578PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

In 1933 petitioner, a common carrier, entered into a “Ereight-Land-Grant Equalization Agreement” with the Quartermaster General, acting for the United States. This agreement was made under the authority of § 22 of the Interstate Commerce Act. 24 Stat. 387, 49 U. S. C. § 22. So far as material here, petitioner agreed “to accept for the transportation of property shipped for account of the Government of the United States and for which the Government of the United States is lawfully entitled to reduced rates over land-grant roads, the lowest net rates lawfully available, as derived through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API