Legal Opinion

Buford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1983No. 1010-82PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted murder and punishment was assessed at fifteen years confinement in the Department of Corrections. The Sixth Court of Appeals in Texarkana affirmed appellant’s conviction. Appellant in his petition for discretionary review argues that the Texarkana Court of Appeals affirmance, based on its interpretation of the Speedy Trial Act, Art. 32A.02, V.A.C.C.P., was error.

The salient facts relating to appellant’s contention and found in the trial record are: Appellant was arrested…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Buford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Ex Parte BroskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. McClellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Carr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API