Bishop v. Carter

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

In this automobile collision case cross-defendant asks reversal because of injection of the subject of insurance into the evidence. Cross-defendant himself was the only party who mentioned insurance. He did so on cross-examination, when, in answer to an innocuous inquiry as to who made a photograph introduced in his behalf and upon his identification, he answered, “I don’t know who made it; the insurance, I guess.” Reversible error is not shown by this voluntary and unresponsive answer by the complaining party, not evoked by his adversary. Texas Textile Mills v.…