Legal Opinion

Roden v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 13, 2019No. Case No. 3:18-cv-239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

B. Evidence of Record

The evidence of record is adequately summarized in the ALJ's decision (PageID 57-67), Plaintiff's Statement of Errors (doc. 11), the Commissioner's memorandum in opposition (doc. 13), and Plaintiff's reply (doc. 14). The undersigned incorporates all of the foregoing and sets forth the facts relevant to this appeal herein.

II

A. Standard of Review

The Court's inquiry on a Social Security appeal is to determine (1) whether the *551ALJ's non-disability finding is supported by substantial evidence, and (2) whether the ALJ employed the correct legal criteria. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ;…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  2. Long v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Martin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
  4. Pollic v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Van Hook v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API