Legal Opinion

Waites v. South Carolina Windstorm & Hail Underwriting Ass'n

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 12, 1983No. 21985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This action was brought by the Respondent-Appellants, Vicki Lee Waites and Belva Waites (Insureds), for windstorm and rain damages to their beach house. They claim under a policy of insurance issued by the Appellant-Respondent, South Carolina Windstorm and Hail Underwriting Association (Association). In addition to property damages, the Insureds sought, but were denied, attorney fees and prejudgment interest. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Insureds. Both the Association and the Insureds have appealed. The Association submits that the trial judge should have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Player v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Ingraham v. PlunkTennessee Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Nelson v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Howell v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Priest v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Washington v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Sunset Cay, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Gauld v. O'SHAUGNESSY REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BruceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API