Legal Opinion

Early v. Baughn

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1975No. Docket 19529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

This protracted litigation was instituted on June 5, 1969 by plaintiff, a property owner on Mud Bay, to enjoin defendants from the completion of certain canals by defendant Baughn under authority of a permit from the Department of Conservation pursuant to 1965 PA 291, the Inland Lakes and Streams Act. The purpose of dredging and other maintenance activities on the canal and channels was to complete the development of a subdivision called Camelot Shores. The only testimony taken at trial was the testimony of plaintiff Early and defendant Laurence E. Baughn. A stipulated set of facts was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pierce v. RileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Three Lakes Ass'n v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API