Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edens v. Barberton Area Family Practice Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-1081Published

1DissentWright, J.

I respectfully dissent. As pointed out in a very objective fashion in the majority opinion, there are strong, and I believe compelling, policy reasons in support of designating the date of mailing as opposed to the date of receipt as the effective notice date in this context. It should be stressed that the law should be, wherever possible, both predictable and evenhanded. If one uses the mailing date, we have a date certain since, of course, it would be that date which would be easily ascertainable and provable in all cases. The result here may be a trap for the unwary plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. George F. & Mary A. Robinson Memorial Portage County HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Gingerich v. PokornyGeauga County Court of Common Pleas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API