Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The action is for work, labor and services. The complaint alleges that “ during the years 1916 and 1923, plaintiff at defendant’s request performed certain work, labor and services at the agreed price and of the reasonable value of Seventy thousand ($70,000) dollars, which the defendant promised and agreed-to pay,” and that “ no part of 'said sum has been paid except the sum of Fifty-six thousand five hundred ($56,500) dollars, although duly demanded.” The answer interposed by the defendant is a general denial.

Thereafter defendant demanded a bill of particulars, and plaintiff for his bill of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Church v. HubbartSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  4. Talbot v. SeemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  5. Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hadlock v. EricDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  2. Garfunkel v. MalcolmsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API