Legal Opinion

Hackleman v. Moat

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrackfoud, J.

This was an action of debt brought by Moat against Hackleman and others, founded on a writing obligatory conditioned for the performance of an agency by Hackleman for Moat, in selling certain medicines and books. The declaration sets out the condition of the bond and assigns breaches. The defendants pleaded three pleas. First, nil debet; secondly, that Hackleman never received the medicines and books; thirdly, that Hackleman was never requested to account. Issues were joined upon these pleas, and a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff below.

It appeared, on the trial, that a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenleaf v. BirthSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smathers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Reynolds v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Darter v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API