Legal Opinion
Armold v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 17, 1938No. Nos. 6457-6460PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
These four appeals present identical facts and questions. All arise out of proceedings under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203. In' each, a petition for relief under section 75 was filed on April 1, 1937, one day before the expiration, on April 2, of the period of redemption on the various tracts of land separately owned by the various farmer-debtors. In each, appellee, which had prosecuted proceedings to .foreclose mortgages held by it against each tract,. moved to strike the. real estate from the schedules and that the debtor proceeding be dismissed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re LowmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Prudential Ins. v. PateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Denney v. Fort Recovery Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monjon v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Feuerstein v. KalbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- In re KofoedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
- In re BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- McCulloch v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938