Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1902No. Docket No. 148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wexford; Chittenden, J. Assumpsit by Louis Meyer, Louis H. Meyer, and James T. Meyer, copartners as the Meyer Hardware Company, against Frank E. Brown and John Sehler, co-partners as Brown & Sehler, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

This case was brought in justice’s court, and after trial there appealed to the circuit, where it was tried before a jury, and verdict and judgment rendered for plaintiffs. The plea was the general issue.

It appears that the plaintiffs are doing business at Man-ton, this State; defendants at Grand Rapids. An arrangement was made by which the plaintiffs were to ship to defendants at Grand Rapids one car load of dry beech and maple wood.. The wood was duly shipped. Defendants claim to have inspected it after its arrival at Grand Rapids, and found, as they claim, that it was green wood, and not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lassone v. Boston & Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API