Baker v. Bindner
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Dissent 1
DISSENTING OPINION
2Dissent · BrooksBrooks, District Judge
I respectfully dissent as, under the circumstances of this case, I cannot read Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 85 S.Ct. 1116, 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965) as compelling the abandonment of the doctrine of abstention. Here, after a full evidentiary hearing (a hearing was not held in Dombrowski) the plaintiffs’ proof has completely failed to establish any of the factual allegations of their complaint and amended complaint upon which they relied for invoking the jurisdiction of this court. They failed to prove a conspiracy by the defendants to “deprive plaintiffs of their…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.