McGee v. Hahn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The plaintiff seeks recovery in this case on the authority of Hopkins v. Droppers, 184 Wis. 400, 198 N. W. 738. In the view that we take of the case we shall not be required to consider the application of that case to the circumstances of this, for we find no evidence which sustains the answer of the jury to the first question by which the jury found that the defendant Ben Hahn was in the habit of permitting his son Earle to drive the truck without being accompanied by an adult person. The only evidence in the case which tends to sustain the jury’s findings in that regard is an admission…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Seibert v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948