Legal Opinion

(PC) Foster v. Shirley

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 16, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00020Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONAS B. FOSTER, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00020-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 14 H. SHIRLEY, et al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) 15 Defendants. ) (ECF No. 17) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Jonas B. Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed on June 1, 2021. 21 I. 22 SCREENING…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API