McSherry v. Capital One FSB
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter has come before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Capital One’s third-party complaint and Capital One’s motion for leave to file the third-party complaint. Having carefully considered the papers filed by the parties in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court has determined that no oral argument shall be necessary. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED and Capital One’s motion is DENIED.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs brought this action for damages stemming from Defendants’ alleged violations of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Toby D. Nelson v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. Ace Electrical Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Title & Escrow Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Keith v. Data Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- Keith v. Data Enters.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- Fouts v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.