Legal Opinion

Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. v. Max South Construction, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 2016No. 16-0987Published

1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, C.J.

Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. (“CID”) petitions for certiorari review of the order granting Max South Construction, Inc.’s (“Contractor”), Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, dismissing CID’s Motion for Leave to Amend, and releasing the cash security posted to secure CID’s Claim of Lien to Contractor from the court registry. We grant the petition, finding that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law, resulting in irreparable harm that cannot be adequately remedied on final appeal. See Kirlin v. Green, 955 So.2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

CID was hired as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scarfone v. MarinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Arch Specialty Insurance Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Kirlin v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Bayview Construction Corp. v. Jomar Properties, LLC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County v. AcandaSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API