Graham v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Justice.
Appellant was found guilty of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. On appeal she contends that the case should be reversed because: an officer was permitted to testify, over objection, that he had seen people less intoxicated than appellant take and flunk an intoxilyzer test; that *833appellant was denied due process under both the United States and the Texas Constitutions, because the arresting officer refused to give her a chemical breath test, after she agreed to take one; and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We disagree with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Arvay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Growe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984