Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 12, 1984No. 05-82-01208-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

Appellant was found guilty of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. On appeal she contends that the case should be reversed because: an officer was permitted to testify, over objection, that he had seen people less intoxicated than appellant take and flunk an intoxilyzer test; that *833appellant was denied due process under both the United States and the Texas Constitutions, because the arresting officer refused to give her a chemical breath test, after she agreed to take one; and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We disagree with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Arvay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Growe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API