Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1965No. 587 MPublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants brought this action, inter alia, under § 1979 of the Revised Statutes, 42 U. S. C. § 1983 (1958 ed.), to enjoin enforcement of the Mississippi Anti-Picketing statute,* on the grounds that it was an unconstitutionally broad regulation of speech, and that it was being applied for the purpose of discouraging appellants’ civil rights activities.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for reconsideration in light of Domhrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479. On remand, the District Court should first consider whether 28 U.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  3. United States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API