Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Wittreich

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentVanderbilt, C. J.

On July 28, 1949, the respondent, Andrew 0. Wittreich, was ordered to answer charges of professional misconduct. The majority of the Court are of the opinion that he should be suspended from the practice of law for two years and until the further order of the Court. This means, in effect, suspension for two years, unless the respondent is guilty meantime of further misconduct.

The imposition of discipline on offending members of the bar is one of the unpleasant duties of our Court, but its performance is essential to public respect for and confidence in the legal profession. It is particularly…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MarksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API