Legal Opinion

Neidhart v. Page

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2015No. C112822EV; A150255Published

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

In this appeal from a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) judgment, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court awarding possession of the premises at issue to plaintiff, who was defendant’s landlord. In so doing, we characterized the judgment on appeal as “award[ing] possession of the rented premises and $2,201 in restitution for unpaid rent to plaintiff.” Neidhart v. Page, 268 Or App 643, 644, 342 P3d 1087 (2015). We also rejected what we understood to be defendant’s argument about the trial court’s obligation to offset a monetary judgment that defendant had obtained against plaintiff in a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neidhart v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API