Legal Opinion

Beeler v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided April 5, 2006No. TC 4746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case comes before the court on a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings brought by Defendant (the department).

II. FACTS

Plaintiff (taxpayer) claimed exemption from withholding on his 2004 Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate (W-4 Form). He twice circled the words “no tax liability” that appeared on the W-4 Form and wrote the word “exempt” on line seven of the form and the following above his signature: “No gift involved sovem [sic] of Washington state without prejudice; UCC 1-207.” Pursuant to OAR 150-316.182, 1 taxpayer’s employer then sent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Curtis v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2004
  4. Atkins v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Curtis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richmond Church of God v. Multnomah Co., Tc-Md 080898c (or.tax 2-20-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API