Hill v. Raney Ins. Agency of Anderson, Inc.

This is an action by Raney Insurance Agency (the agent) to recover automobile insurance premiums from Mr. Hill.

After the parties testified before the trial court, a judgment was rendered in favor of the agent and against Mr. Hill for $1,160. Mr. Hill has appealed.

We have reviewed the evidence in light of the ore tenus rule. The following pertinent evidence is revealed.

The business relationship between the parties as to automobile insurance extended from May 1976 to July 1980. They executed no written contract concerning their course of dealings with each other. Mrs. Hill would telephone the…