Reavis v. Reavis

At the suit of the appellee, the chancellor perpetually enjoined an action of ejectment commenced against him by the appellant, Reavis, Jr., and divested out of the latter whatever title or interest he had in the land in question, and vested it in the complainant; and his decree is now assigned as error.

It is clearly shown that Wiley, Truss, and Landrum sold and conveyed the land to Reavis, Jr., and Taylor, and afterwards recovered judgment against them on the note which they gave for the purchase-money. While the matter was in this condition, the appellee agreed with his son,' Reavis, Jr.,…