Legal Opinion

Escudero-Aponte v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 22, 2003No. 19-1789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Hector Escudero-Aponte ultimately seeks to appeal from the district court’s rejection on the merits of his ineffective assistance of counsel claims, presented in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. However, his present request is for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal from the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. Specifically, petitioner sought and was denied permission under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6) to reopen the time to appeal from denial of his § 2255 motion. Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of that denial pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6).…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. David Paul Voytik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. TylerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
  2. Rojas-Medina v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API