Legal Opinion

Pippins v. Saul (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 10, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00943Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DIANE PIPPINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 3:18-cv-943-JTA ) (WO) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security,1 ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), the claimant, Diane Pippins (“Pippins”), brings this action to review a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). (Doc. No. 1 at 1.)2 The Commissioner denied Pippins’ claim for a period of disability and for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). (Id.) The…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Renee S. Phillips v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API