Holt v. Ames
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is a suit by the appellee, Robert C. Ames, for specific performance of an option contract by which the appellant, J. L. Holt, assertedly bound himself to sell a parcel of land to Ames for $35,000.00. The appellant’s main contention is that the option contract ivas not sufficiently definite and certain to be specifically enforceable. The chancellor rejected that defense and entered a decree granting the relief sought by the purchaser.
In the court below the defendant filed an answer denying all material allegations of the complaint. Such a denial casts upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanford v. SagerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Tate v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Creighton v. HugginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Jonesboro Investment Corp. v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Miller v. BestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norton v. HindsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968