Legal Opinion

Holt v. Ames

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 1966No. 5-3745PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a suit by the appellee, Robert C. Ames, for specific performance of an option contract by which the appellant, J. L. Holt, assertedly bound himself to sell a parcel of land to Ames for $35,000.00. The appellant’s main contention is that the option contract ivas not sufficiently definite and certain to be specifically enforceable. The chancellor rejected that defense and entered a decree granting the relief sought by the purchaser.

In the court below the defendant filed an answer denying all material allegations of the complaint. Such a denial casts upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanford v. SagerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Tate v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Creighton v. HugginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Jonesboro Investment Corp. v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Miller v. BestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norton v. HindsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API