Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Karenius

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Petitioners seek to obtain from the city treasury a fund deposited therein by the administrator for the benefit of unknown kin. The sole question involved is whether petitioners are “ relatives of the deceased on the part of the mother ” of deceased. The proof shows that deceased was an illegitimate child and that his mother was also the mother of each of petitioners and that each of petitioners was born out of wedlock. The proof shows that the mother, of deceased predeceased him. •-

*653Subdivision 7 of section 83 of the Decedent Estate Law is here applicable. It says: “ If the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schult v. . MollNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Heller v. TeamsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1914
  3. In re the Estate of LutzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KennyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API