Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Rauh Rubber, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 17, 1996No. Civil 4-96-202PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. (“3M”) filed a complaint on March 3, 1996, against defendants Rauh Rubber, Inc. (“Rauh Rubber”), GAIA Enterprises, Inc. (“GAIA”), and two principals of both corporations, James Rauh and Joseph Rauh, in connection with the resale of 3M trademarked reflective materials 3M scrapped and sold to Rauh Rubber. 3M contends that the materials were sold to Rauh Rubber with the express understanding that they were to be used exclusively for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Dairy Queen Corp. v. New Line Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- NOKOTA HORSE CONSERVANCY, INC. v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2009
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Iowa Paint Manufacturing Co. v. Hirshfield's Paint Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
- Bel Canto Design, Ltd. v. MSS HIFIDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.