Legal Opinion

Markard v. Markard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 25, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the law firm of Bangser, Klein, Rocca & Blum appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated May 21, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion to compel it to turn over her file to her incoming attorney prior to holding a hearing to fix the amount of its retaining lien.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing in accordance herewith.

"It is well settled that an attorney who has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosen v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Andreiev v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Factors v. Cedar Tide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Corby v. CitibankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Artim v. ArtimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mosiello v. VelenzuelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Eighteen Associates, LLC v. Nanjim Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Rotker v. RotkerNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API