Linville v. Hadden & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.).
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiffs, Hadden & Co., a New York firm, were creditors of the Natchaug Silk Company. The latter became insolvent and James E. Hayden was appointed its receiver by a decree of the Superior Court of Wind-ham County, Connecticut, on the 26th of April, 1895. On the 27th of December of the same year the plaintiffs caused to be issued from the Superior Court of Baltimore City a foreign attactment against the Silk Co., and it was laid in the hands of the appellant, Charles H. Linville, as garnishee. We held in the former appeal, Hadden & Co. v. Linville, Garnishee, 86 Md. 210, growing out of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Day v. Postal Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Lycoming Fire Insurance ex rel. Beeber v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Mason, Chapin & Co. v. Union Mills Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Bartlett v. WilburCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Castleman v. TemplemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roberts v. W. H. Hughes Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Brynjolfson v. OsthusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Hieston v. Natl. City Bk. of ChicagoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Standard Founders, Inc. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Martin v. United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers, Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.