House of Stuart, Inc., D/B/A Stuart's House of Vacuums C. Dan Stuart, President v. Whirlpool Corporation, D/B/A Whirlpool
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
33 F.3d 58
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
HOUSE OF STUART, INC., d/b/a Stuart's House of Vacuums; C.
Dan Stuart, President, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, d/b/a Whirlpool, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-35587.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994.
Decided Aug. 15, 1994.
Before: ALARCON, BEEZER AND KLEINFELD, Circuit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Wallis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bernice Pierce v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Kitchen Krafters, Inc. v. Eastside BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Farley Transportation Co., Inc., Systems Terminal, Inc. And Piggyback Trailermate, Inc. v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.