Legal Opinion

In Re Landmark

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1985No. 19-40439PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

GREGORY F. KISHEL, Bankruptcy Judge.

The above-captioned matter came on before the undersigned United States Bankruptcy Judge upon a motion for modification of injunction brought on by Louis A. Schaefbauer, a scheduled creditor herein. Movant appeared by his attorney, Shawn M. Dunlevy. Debtors Stanley J. Landmark and Judith E. Landmark (hereinafter “Debtors”) appeared by their attorney, John N. Nys. Upon Movant’s motion, the arguments of counsel, and all of the other files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court makes the following Findings of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. National Council of Junior Order of United American Mechanics of United States of North America v. ZytnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Kretschman v. StollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. United Presidential Life Insurance v. BarkerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  5. Landmark v. Schaefbauer (In Re Landmark)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate Of Roger LellockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Cortez v. American Wheel, Inc. (In Re Cortez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Shawmut Bank v. Brooks Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Debtor & Trustee (In Re Moscoso Villaronga)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989
  5. Estate of Lellock v. Prudential InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API