Legal Opinion
Normile v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1904No. 4741PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, T., entered January 19, 1903, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to recover from a carrier for the loss of goods.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
Action brought in the superior court of King county by plaintiff, S. Normile, against defendant, The Northern Pacific Railway Company, on account of the loss of freight. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law were made in the trial court:
“(1) That on December 11th, 1901, at Portland, Oregon, the defendant received from the plaintiff for shipment to Premont, Washington, for the sum of $34, the following goods, wares and merchandise, to- wit, one donkey engine and tool box and two coils of steel cable. (2) That the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allam v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Kirk v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- McGregor v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Reid v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Rosenbaum v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Southern Railway Co. v. W. T. Adams Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Fisher v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.