Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cobb v. State Security Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 1979No. 60626Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBardgett, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The reason this case was transferred after opinion in the Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis district, was to review the question of whether the putative father has a cause of action for the wrongful death of his illegitimate child. The principal opinion recognizes this to be the core issue in the case and, after citing a number of cases, states that we are compelled to conclude that when a biological father openly acknowledges paternity, exercises custody and responsibility with respect to supervision, support, protection and care for the child,1 he has a right to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Marshall v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Sterns v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API