Richards v. Inman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWelch, Justice
I agree of course that upon the death of Ella, her second husband did not acquire or have any homestead right in the homestead right theretofore acquired by Ella from her deceased first husband. That is the rule stated in the syllabus, and I agree to that rule.
I also agree with the rule stated in 40 C.J.S., Homesteads, § 259, p. 750, which is quoted on page 3 of the majority opinion. That rule is in line with the syllabus of the majority opinion.
But there is another question presented in the case which is not discussed or decided in the majority opinion. It is the contention of Richards that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kulbeth v. Drew County Timber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Lehman v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Murphey v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- In Re Musselman's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Schultz v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.