Legal Opinion
State v. Butz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 24, 1990No. 89-3206PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
568 So.2d 537 (1990)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
George Franklin BUTZ, Appellee.
No. 89-3206.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
October 24, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogrs, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Bruce A. Zimet of Bruce A. Zimet, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
POLEN, Judge.
The state timely seeks review of the trial court's denial, on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, of the state's post-trial and post-sentencing hearing, rule 3.800 motion requesting the imposition of restitution. We affirm.
After a jury…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Grice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. MacLeodSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Weaver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.