Legal Opinion

Davidsohn v. Doyle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1992No. 21481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Facts

Appellant Luis Davidsohn leased land and commercial warehouses to the respondent, Helen Doyle. Doyle, in turn, subleased space to various parties. The Davidsohn-Doyle lease requires Doyle, at her own cost, to keep the entire demised premises in good condition and repair. Paragraph 7(h) of the lease permits the lessor to reenter the property and terminate the lease upon the lessee’s breach.

In February 1988, Davidsohn hired Ivan Tippetts, a real estate appraiser and licensed contractor, to inspect the condition of the leased premises. Tippetts’ inspection revealed “a complete…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Mullis v. Nevada National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Roberts v. Second Judicial District Court ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Reno Realty and Investment Co. v. HornsteinNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Woodland Theatres, Inc. v. ABC Intermountain Theatres, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lorenz v. Beltio, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Davidsohn v. SteffensNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Daily v. U.S. Micro Powders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API